Have you been struggling with starting your research paper for a long time ? Do you sometimes stare at the blank piece of paper wondering, you know, how to get started writing the introduction to the paper and what to put in there? Do you find yourself wasting a lot of time and just feeling frustrated that the words aren’t flowing well ? We will help you exactly, how to start your research paper, so that you can write it much faster and you know you’re not staring at the blind piece of paper. We run academic English. Now, where we help phd students and researchers to write research papers for top journals in the field. So, starting the introduction can be very tricky to a lot of people.
Introduction :
In fact for a lot of people, writing the introduction is the most difficult part of the research paper. My clients tell me that writing the methodology is very simple. Because, they kind of already did that and presenting the results is okay as well. Because, they know what results they’ve got but how do they start their introduction. You know how they write the introduction and I’ve got a step-by-step guide as well to write the whole introduction. The starting point is very important because, sometimes you know we are just kind of staring at a blank piece of paper. We don’t know what to put down and we’re getting more and more frustrated and then our passes and we’ve written like five words and then we read what we’ve written and we just deleted and we start all over again right, but this isn’t necessary. Because, there is a very very typical way of starting the introduction that practically all papers in all disciplines use, what is it ? Well, it’s either stating the importance of the topic or providing a definition of a key term. How does that work well? You want to at the very beginning of the paper. You want to tell the reader. Why this paper is important and why should they care at all.
After all, a reviewer will read hundreds of papers. You know, so they want to know straight up. Why should they read your paper and what’s so important about your topic right? There are three different ways in which you can state the importance of the topic. For example, you can state the importance of the topic for society or the world in general. So, if you’ve got a topic related to for example, poverty or unemployment, right. Something that affects large groups of people then you could talk about. In about it, in the first paragraph and typically people write things like you know in recent years. Unemployment has risen by x percent in several different countries right to kind of underscore the importance of this. Another way of doing this is to state the importance of your topic for your discipline. So, not everybody has a topic that’s got a really big impact on society or the world but everybody has a topic, you know that’s important for their discipline and typically what researchers then do is they say things like you know. Various studies have been conducted on or this topic has received increased attention from researchers right and this just kind of highlights that this is an important topic.
People are studying it right. So that’s the second way. Now, the third way in which you can state the importance of the topic is to talk about a big problem that needs resolving and that’s somehow very similar to sometimes excuse me very similar to the importance of the topic for the society right but it’s more framed in terms of a problem. So, you basically state a problem like unemployment and highlight. How important solving this problem is, so that’s kind of the first big way of starting a paper, the importance of the topic and you can present it in three different ways, the second way that is often related to it is to provide a definition of the key term or terms right. Sometimes, what people do is they put it straight up as the first sentence. The first paragraph you know and they provide a definition of a key term like a paper could start something like you know Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease is a disease correct if Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by and then you provide a definition of it. Sometimes people combine it with the importance of the topic. So they say that currently more than 300 000 people in the USA alone suffer from Alzheimer’s disease. So, you kind of have the importance of the topic and the definition all in the same.
How to use AI for phd research ?
Don’t use AI tools for research until you’ve known about this all of these. People have rules for using generative AI in their journals. This is look at all this boring stuff, this is Why look at all of this stuff. This is another one plus. There’s all the stuff, they want you to know about using AI. We’re going to go through all of the rules and the first one is the most important do you remember a time when people were like you shouldn’t use AI. It’s cheating. They realize now that they like using AI. So, now they’re like it’s okay just here are the rules. So, the first thing you should know is that they want you to disclose whether or not you’re using AI. So, the way you can do that is by putting it in acknowledgement section. You can put it in like a disclosure statement but essentially each Journal has their own way and this is what people are saying about it.
So, in journals it says authors should disclose in their manuscript. The use of AI and AI assisted technology and a statement will appear in the published work. Why do author Services say ? if an author has used a gen AI tool to develop any portion of manuscript. It must be described transparently and in detail. The details are very important. It’s the type of tool you’re using, how you’ve used it as well as the large language model that you’ve used for example gpt4 or clae anthropic. Those sort of things are very important and it says in the method section or in a disclosure within the acknowledgement section as applicable. So some places want you to put it into the method section of writing that paper.
Is it okay to use ai for a research paper ? :
If you’ve used it for any sort of like process to do with your research but you can’t use it for all of your research. The next one is just as important. One of the biggest rules is AI should not be used for original research. Now, what does that mean, they only want you to use AI tools for language stuff essentially. They don’t want you to alter images which we all know is not right and not ethical. You can’t make up results and you shouldn’t be using AI to kind of like change the words or the outcome of your conclusions because that is clearly not your own work. We do not permit the use of gen AI or AI sister tools to create or alter images in submitting manuscripts we’ve all been there we’ve got these little results and we’re like oh if only that little smudge wasn’t there or if only this was a little bit clearer don’t use it for that only use it if you’re submitting to a journal for language based things so we all know that you shouldn’t fabricate results so don’t use AI to fabricate results and it’s one of the easiest ones to comply with, I think I often get like questions like, Well, I use this which probably is AI like grammarly or some other language tool but there are different rules for different journals this is what else says, it says these Technologies should only be used to improve readability and the language of the work. Now, that’s really important because you can use it to make it more academic.
You can use it to make sure that your conclusions are clear and that it’s structured in the right way but what you can’t do is say I’ve got this conclusion, is there anything else. I can talk about it. If you’re adding to the knowledge but you can use it to change the language. It’s a fine line sometimes but those are the rules and then it says down here tools that are used to improve spelling grammar and general editing are not included in the scope of these guidelines. So, if you’re using a tool like spell Checkers or grammarly. You don’t need to worry about putting it in there as an AI assisted tool. If it really helps you sort of formulate the language that you’re going to use. Now, listen up, this is all about making sure you are responsible for the language and the text that you are presenting as your own work. So, here plus one says all of the statements in the article reporting to all of those things represent the author’s own ideas and so, the use of AI tools and Technologies to fabricate or otherwise misrepresent primary research data is unacceptable. That is your warning. You need to be sure that you are comfortable and it truly represents your thoughts on the results or the conclusions you are presenting.
Why goes a little bit further and says the author is fully responsible for the accuracy of any information provided by the author and for correctly referencing any supporting work on which that information depends. So, AI is this great plausibility machine. Sometimes, it gives you stuff that sounds so plausible but in fact is made up. So, you need to make sure that you’re referencing any bits of information. All of the different journals have said this that chat GPT or any large language model does not constitute authorship so in nature they say large language model such as chat gpt2 do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria and that’s because they need to be able to be sort of like questioned and made accountable for the stuff. They’re putting in to the research paper. So, you should be able to go to an author and say why did you do this justify to me. Why this is a thing and chat GPT can’t do that because, it doesn’t have the intimate knowledge of your results of the background that you’re trained in all of those things mean that it doesn’t sort of qualify as authorship merely a tool AI as an author. So, there, we are just don’t put it as the top like you can’t have Stapleton at Al. You can’t have chat GPT at Al. We all know that right, don’t we yeah good and the last thing, I think we need to know about using AI in research is the most important one in making sure that research stays credible now AI tools should not be used to evaluate someone else’s ideas in peer review first of all uploading their information into chat GPT or a large language model could break confidentiality.